Re: [PATCH v11 05/14] s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:47:22 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:14:22 -0500
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [..]
> > >>   }
> > >>   
> > >> +#define MDEV_SHARING_ERR "Userspace may not re-assign queue %02lx.%04lx " \
> > >> +			 "already assigned to %s"
> > >> +
> > >> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_log_sharing_err(const char *mdev_name,
> > >> +					 unsigned long *apm,
> > >> +					 unsigned long *aqm)
> > >> +{
> > >> +	unsigned long apid, apqi;
> > >> +
> > >> +	for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, apm, AP_DEVICES)
> > >> +		for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, aqm, AP_DOMAINS)
> > >> +			pr_err(MDEV_SHARING_ERR, apid, apqi, mdev_name);  
> > > Isn't error rather severe for this? For my taste even warning would be
> > > severe for this.  
> > 
> > The user only sees a EADDRINUSE returned from the sysfs interface,
> > so Conny asked if I could log a message to indicate which APQNs are
> > in use by which mdev. I can change this to an info message, but it
> > will be missed if the log level is set higher. Maybe Conny can put in
> > her two cents here since she asked for this.
> >   
> 
> I'm looking forward to Conny's opinion. :)

(only just saw this; -ETOOMANYEMAILS)

It is probably not an error in the sense of "things are broken, this
cannot work"; but I'd consider this at least a warning "this does not
work as you intended".




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux