On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:47:22 +0100 Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:14:22 -0500 > Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [..] > > >> } > > >> > > >> +#define MDEV_SHARING_ERR "Userspace may not re-assign queue %02lx.%04lx " \ > > >> + "already assigned to %s" > > >> + > > >> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_log_sharing_err(const char *mdev_name, > > >> + unsigned long *apm, > > >> + unsigned long *aqm) > > >> +{ > > >> + unsigned long apid, apqi; > > >> + > > >> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, apm, AP_DEVICES) > > >> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, aqm, AP_DOMAINS) > > >> + pr_err(MDEV_SHARING_ERR, apid, apqi, mdev_name); > > > Isn't error rather severe for this? For my taste even warning would be > > > severe for this. > > > > The user only sees a EADDRINUSE returned from the sysfs interface, > > so Conny asked if I could log a message to indicate which APQNs are > > in use by which mdev. I can change this to an info message, but it > > will be missed if the log level is set higher. Maybe Conny can put in > > her two cents here since she asked for this. > > > > I'm looking forward to Conny's opinion. :) (only just saw this; -ETOOMANYEMAILS) It is probably not an error in the sense of "things are broken, this cannot work"; but I'd consider this at least a warning "this does not work as you intended".