Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/5] s390x: SCLP feature checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/20 10:15 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/11/2020 16.42, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Availability of SIE is announced via a feature bit in a SCLP info CPU
>> entry. Let's add a framework that allows us to easily check for such
>> facilities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  lib/s390x/io.c   |  1 +
>>  lib/s390x/sclp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  lib/s390x/sclp.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> [...]
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>> index 6620531..bcc9f4b 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ typedef struct CPUEntry {
>>      uint8_t reserved1;
>>  } __attribute__((packed)) CPUEntry;
>>  
>> +extern struct sclp_facilities sclp_facilities;
>> +
>> +struct sclp_facilities {
>> +	u64 has_sief2 : 1;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * test_bit() uses unsigned long ptrs so we give it the ptr to the
>> + * address member and offset bits by 1> + */
>> +enum sclp_cpu_feature_bit {
>> +	SCLP_CPU_FEATURE_SIEF2_BIT = 16 + 4,
>> +};
> 
> That's kind of ugly ... why don't you simply replace the CPUEntry.features[]
> array with a bitfield, similar to what the kernel does with "struct
> sclp_core_entry" ?

That's an excellent idea, will do!

> 
>  Thomas
> 
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux