Re: [PATCH] s390: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 12:50 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Ah, but that's because later patches assume that TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is
> always there once all archs have been converted. If you just want to back
> out that patch, you'll need to just revert this one:
> 
> commit 82ef6998ed9d488e56bbfbcc2ec9adf62bf78f08
> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Oct 9 16:04:39 2020 -0600
> 
>     kernel: remove checking for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
> 
> as well and I suspect it should build.

No, at the minimal, I'll need to revert those to build successfully.

7b074c15374c io_uring: remove 'twa_signal_ok' deadlock work-around
eb48a0f216fa kernel: remove checking for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
c634e6b63a81 signal: kill JOBCTL_TASK_WORK
f8b667db31a3 io_uring: JOBCTL_TASK_WORK is no longer used by task_work
4c3d9c3b415a s390: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

Then, it will fix the boot issue as well.







[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux