Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x: pv: implement routine to share/unshare memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2020-09-28 10:22, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 9/25/20 6:02 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
When communicating with the host we need to share part of
the memory.

Let's implement the ultravisor calls for this.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/asm/uv.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
index 4c2fc48..19019e4 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
@@ -71,4 +71,37 @@ static inline int uv_call(unsigned long r1, unsigned long r2)
  	return cc;
  }
+static inline int share(unsigned long addr, u16 cmd)
+{
+	struct uv_cb_share uvcb = {
+		.header.cmd = cmd,
+		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
+		.paddr = addr
+	};
+
+	uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
+	return uvcb.header.rc;

That's not a great idea, rc is > 1 for error codes...
In the kernel we check for the cc instead since uv_call() has only 0/1
as possible cc return values.

hum, Yes.
I will add some report too here in case of error.




--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux