The boundary_size might be as large as ULONG_MAX, which means
that a device has no specific boundary limit. So either "+ 1"
or passing it to ALIGN() would potentially overflow.
According to kernel defines:
#define ALIGN_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
#define ALIGN(x, a) ALIGN_MASK(x, (typeof(x))(a) - 1)
We can simplify the logic here:
ALIGN(boundary + 1, 1 << shift) >> shift
= ALIGN_MASK(b + 1, (1 << s) - 1) >> s
= {[b + 1 + (1 << s) - 1] & ~[(1 << s) - 1]} >> s
= [b + 1 + (1 << s) - 1] >> s
= [b + (1 << s)] >> s
= (b >> s) + 1
So fixing a potential overflow with the safer shortcut.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
index e89031e9c847..7fa0bb490065 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static unsigned long alloc_iommu(struct device *dev, int size,
base_index = ALIGN(iommu_bus_base & dma_get_seg_boundary(dev),
PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- boundary_size = ALIGN((u64)dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) + 1,
- PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ /* Overflow-free shortcut for: ALIGN(b + 1, 1 << s) >> s */
+ boundary_size = (dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1;
spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu_bitmap_lock, flags);
offset = iommu_area_alloc(iommu_gart_bitmap, iommu_pages, next_bit,
--
2.17.1
