Re: [PATCH] s390/test_unwind: fix possible memleak in test_unwind()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:35:15AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-30 at 14:36 +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
> > test_unwind() misses to call kfree(bt) in an error path.
> > Add the missed function call to fix it.
> > 
> > Fixes: 0610154650f1 ("s390/test_unwind: print verbose unwinding
> > results")
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > index 32b7a30b2485..b0b12b46bc57 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static noinline int test_unwind(struct task_struct
> > *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> >  			break;
> >  		if (state.reliable && !addr) {
> >  			pr_err("unwind state reliable but addr is
> > 0\n");
> > +			kfree(bt);
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> >  		}
> >  		sprint_symbol(sym, addr);
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux