On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:23:48 +0200 Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/23/20 2:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:58:11 -0400 > > Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Sometimes we need to do cleanup which we don't necessarily want to add > >> to interrupt.c, so lets add a way to register a cleanup function. > > > > s/lets/let's/ :) > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h | 1 + > >> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 9 +++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h > >> index 4cfade9..b2a7c83 100644 > >> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h > >> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h > >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > >> #define EXT_IRQ_EXTERNAL_CALL 0x1202 > >> #define EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG 0x2401 > >> > >> +void register_pgm_int_func(void (*f)(void)); > >> void handle_pgm_int(void); > >> void handle_ext_int(void); > >> void handle_mcck_int(void); > >> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c > >> index 243b9c2..36ba720 100644 > >> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c > >> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c > >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > >> > >> static bool pgm_int_expected; > >> static bool ext_int_expected; > >> +static void (*pgm_int_func)(void); > >> static struct lowcore *lc; > >> > >> void expect_pgm_int(void) > >> @@ -51,8 +52,16 @@ void check_pgm_int_code(uint16_t code) > >> lc->pgm_int_code); > >> } > >> > >> +void register_pgm_int_func(void (*f)(void)) > >> +{ > >> + pgm_int_func = f; > >> +} > >> + > >> static void fixup_pgm_int(void) > >> { > >> + if (pgm_int_func) > >> + return (*pgm_int_func)(); > >> + > > > > Maybe rather call this function, if set, instead of fixup_pgm_int() in > > handle_pgm_int()? Feels a bit cleaner to me. > > Well it's currently a cleanup function so it should be in > fixup_pgm_int() because it fixes up. > > I don't need a handler here like Pierre with his IO changes. > > So it might more sense to change the name of the function ptr and > registration function: > > register_pgm_cleanup_func() > static void (*pgm_cleanup_func)(void); Sounds good. But doesn't that cleanup func run instead of the 'normal' cleanup func? I think making that distinction in handle_pgm_int() is clearer. > > > > >> switch (lc->pgm_int_code) { > >> case PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION: > >> /* Normal operation is in supervisor state, so this exception > > > >
Attachment:
pgpueGwwTIQ6E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature