On 7/23/20 2:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:03:10 +0200 > Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 7/21/20 4:28 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> On 21/07/2020 10.52, Janosch Frank wrote: >>>> On 7/21/20 9:28 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>>> On 17/07/2020 16.58, Janosch Frank wrote: >>>>>> If a exception new psw mask contains a key a specification exception >>>>>> instead of a special operation exception is presented. >>>>> >>>>> I have troubles parsing that sentence... could you write that differently? >>>>> (and: "s/a exception/an exception/") >>>> >>>> How about: >>>> >>>> When an exception psw new with a storage key in its mask is loaded from >>>> lowcore a specification exception is raised instead of the special >>>> operation exception that is normally presented when skrf is active. >>> >>> Still a huge beast of a sentence. Could you maybe make two sentences out >>> of it? For example: >>> >>> " ... is raised. This differs from the normal case where ..." >> >> When an exception psw new with a storage key in its mask is loaded from >> lowcore a specification exception is raised. This behavior differs from >> the one that is presented when trying to execute skey related >> instructions which will raise special operation exceptions. > > s/psw new/new psw/ ? Yeah that would align the naming with the pop one. > > (And probably a comma after 'lowcore'.) > > "This differs from the behaviour when trying to execute skey related > instructions, which will result in special operation exceptions." > > ? Sure
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
