[PATCH net-next 07/10] s390/qeth: clean up a magic number in the OAT callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use the correct struct member instead of hardcoding its offset.

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 31fa9ffc7cf4..c5ff7edb4ba1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -4839,7 +4839,6 @@ static int qeth_setadpparms_query_oat_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 {
 	struct qeth_ipa_cmd *cmd = (struct qeth_ipa_cmd *)data;
 	struct qeth_qoat_priv *priv;
-	char *resdata;
 	int resdatalen;
 
 	QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 3, "qoatcb");
@@ -4848,13 +4847,12 @@ static int qeth_setadpparms_query_oat_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 
 	priv = (struct qeth_qoat_priv *)reply->param;
 	resdatalen = cmd->data.setadapterparms.hdr.cmdlength;
-	resdata = (char *)data + 28;
 
 	if (resdatalen > (priv->buffer_len - priv->response_len))
 		return -ENOSPC;
 
-	memcpy((priv->buffer + priv->response_len), resdata,
-		resdatalen);
+	memcpy(priv->buffer + priv->response_len,
+	       &cmd->data.setadapterparms.hdr, resdatalen);
 	priv->response_len += resdatalen;
 
 	if (cmd->data.setadapterparms.hdr.seq_no <
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux