On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:12:05 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2020-07-09 13:40, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:07:47 +0200
> > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> A second step when testing the channel subsystem is to prepare a channel
> >> for use.
> >> This includes:
> >> - Get the current subchannel Information Block (SCHIB) using STSCH
> >> - Update it in memory to set the ENABLE bit and the specified ISC
> >> - Tell the CSS that the SCHIB has been modified using MSCH
> >> - Get the SCHIB from the CSS again to verify that the subchannel is
> >> enabled and uses the specified ISC.
> >> - If the command succeeds but subchannel is not enabled or the ISC
> >> field is not as expected, retry a predefined retries count.
> >> - If the command fails, report the failure and do not retry, even
> >> if cc indicates a busy/status pending as we do not expect this.
> >>
> >> This tests the MSCH instruction to enable a channel successfully.
> >> Retries are done and in case of error, and if the retries count
> >> is exceeded, a report is made.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> lib/s390x/css.h | 8 +++--
> >> lib/s390x/css_lib.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> s390x/css.c | 15 ++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> +/*
> >> + * css_msch: enable subchannel and set with specified ISC
> >
> > "css_enable: enable the subchannel with the specified ISC"
> >
> > ?
> >
> >> + * @schid: Subchannel Identifier
> >> + * @isc : number of the interruption subclass to use
> >> + * Return value:
> >> + * On success: 0
> >> + * On error the CC of the faulty instruction
> >> + * or -1 if the retry count is exceeded.
> >> + */
> >> +int css_enable(int schid, int isc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pmcw *pmcw = &schib.pmcw;
> >> + int retry_count = 0;
> >> + uint16_t flags;
> >> + int cc;
> >> +
> >> + /* Read the SCHIB for this subchannel */
> >> + cc = stsch(schid, &schib);
> >> + if (cc) {
> >> + report_info("stsch: sch %08x failed with cc=%d", schid, cc);
> >> + return cc;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + flags = PMCW_ENABLE | (isc << PMCW_ISC_SHIFT);
> >> + if ((pmcw->flags & flags) == flags) {
> >
> > I think you want (pmcw->flags & PMCW_ENABLE) == PMCW_ENABLE -- this
> > catches the case of "subchannel has been enabled before, but with a
> > different isc".
>
> If with a different ISC, we need to modify the ISC.
> Don't we ?
I think that's a policy decision (I would probably fail and require a
disable before setting another isc, but that's a matter of taste).
Regardless, I think the current check doesn't even catch the 'different
isc' case?
>
> >
> >> + report_info("stsch: sch %08x already enabled", schid);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
>
>
>
> >
> > (...)
> >
>
>
