Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2020-07-07 13:05, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:57:03 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2020-07-06 16:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:01:50 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2020-07-06 11:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu,  2 Jul 2020 18:31:20 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After a channel is enabled we start a SENSE_ID command using
the SSCH instruction to recognize the control unit and device.

This tests the success of SSCH, the I/O interruption and the TSCH
instructions.

The SENSE_ID command response is tested to report 0xff inside
its reserved field and to report the same control unit type
as the cu_type kernel argument.

Without the cu_type kernel argument, the test expects a device
with a default control unit type of 0x3832, a.k.a virtio-net-ccw.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
    lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h |   1 +
    lib/s390x/css.h          |  32 ++++++++-
    lib/s390x/css_lib.c      | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
    s390x/css.c              |  94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
    4 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(...)
@@ -114,6 +128,7 @@ retry:
    		return cc;
    	}
+ report_info("stsch: flags: %04x", pmcw->flags);

It feels like all of this already should have been included in the
previous patch?

Yes, I did not want to modify it since it was reviewed-by.

It's not such a major change (the isc change and this here), though...
what do the others think?
changed my mind:
What about keeping css_enable() to only do enable, in case we only want
to do this, and add a function to modify the ISC.

Hm, the isc is only really relevant while the subchannel is enabled, so
this would be fine if we only ever modified the isc while the
subchannel is disabled. On the other hand, we introduce an extra round
of msch. No strong opinion on my side.


Hum too, I fear we can not avoid the msch round:
After your comment I realize that we can not let the channel enabled without a valid ISC in the case we enable IRQ.
So unless other opinion, back to the css_enable(schid, isc).


--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux