Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:53:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:02:57AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > In order to use <asm/percpu.h> in irqflags.h, we need to make sure
> > > asm/percpu.h does not itself depend on irqflags.h.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h |    2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> > >   * in the TPIDRPRW. TPIDRPRW only exists on V6K and V7
> > >   */
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_CPU_V6)
> > > +register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm ("sp");
> > 
> > If you define this unconditionally, then we can probably get rid of the
> > copy in asm/thread_info.h, rather than duplicate the same #define.
> 
> The below delta seems to build arm-allnoconfig, arm-defconfig and
> arm-allmodconfig.
> 
> Although please don't ask me how asm/thread_info.h includes asm/percpu.h
> 
> Does that work for you?

Yes, thanks! I can't believe you removed the helpful comment.

> -/*
> - * how to get the current stack pointer in C
> - */

Will



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux