Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:54:46 +0200
Cc: mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chainsaw@xxxxxxxxxx, christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx, ravenexp@xxxxxxxxx, roopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, markward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org>
References: <20200610154923.27510-5-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20200623141157.5409-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <b7d658b9-606a-feb1-61f9-b58e3420d711@de.ibm.com> <3118dc0d-a3af-9337-c897-2380062a8644@de.ibm.com> <20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0


On 24.06.20 16:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Does anyone have an idea why "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" breaks the
>> linux-bridge on s390?
> 
> Are we even sure this is s390 specific and doesn't happen on other
> architectures with the same bridge setup?

Fair point. AFAIK nobody has tested this yet on x86.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  - From: Luis Chamberlain

References:
- Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  - From: Christian Borntraeger
- Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  - From: Christian Borntraeger
- Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]