Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2020-06-09 09:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/06/2020 10.13, Pierre Morel wrote:
A second step when testing the channel subsystem is to prepare a channel
for use.
This includes:
- Get the current subchannel Information Block (SCHIB) using STSCH
- Update it in memory to set the ENABLE bit
- Tell the CSS that the SCHIB has been modified using MSCH
- Get the SCHIB from the CSS again to verify that the subchannel is
   enabled.
- If the command succeeds but subchannel is not enabled retry a
   predefined retries count.
- If the command fails, report the failure and do not retry, even
   if cc indicates a busy/status pending as we do not expect this.

This tests the MSCH instruction to enable a channel succesfuly.
This some retries are done and in case of error, and if the retries
count is exceeded, a report is made.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/css_lib.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  s390x/css.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
index dc5a512..831a116 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
  #include <string.h>
  #include <interrupt.h>
  #include <asm/arch_def.h>
+#include <asm/time.h>
#include <css.h> @@ -68,3 +69,62 @@ out:
  		    scn, scn_found, dev_found);
  	return schid;
  }
+
+int css_enable(int schid)
+{
+	struct pmcw *pmcw = &schib.pmcw;
+	int retry_count = 0;
+	int cc;
+
+	/* Read the SCHIB for this subchannel */
+	cc = stsch(schid, &schib);
+	if (cc) {
+		report_info("stsch failed with cc=%d", cc);
+		return cc;
+	}
+
+	if (pmcw->flags & PMCW_ENABLE) {
+		report_info("stsch: sch %08x already enabled", schid);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+retry:
+	/* Update the SCHIB to enable the channel */
+	pmcw->flags |= PMCW_ENABLE;
+
+	/* Tell the CSS we want to modify the subchannel */
+	cc = msch(schid, &schib);
+	if (cc) {
+		/*
+		 * If the subchannel is status pending or
+		 * if a function is in progress,
+		 * we consider both cases as errors.
+		 */
+		report_info("msch failed with cc=%d", cc);
+		return cc;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Read the SCHIB again to verify the enablement
+	 */
+	cc = stsch(schid, &schib);
+	if (cc) {
+		report_info("stsch failed with cc=%d", cc);
+		return cc;
+	}
+
+	if (pmcw->flags & PMCW_ENABLE) {
+		report_info("Subchannel %08x enabled after %d retries",
+			    schid, retry_count);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (retry_count++ < MAX_ENABLE_RETRIES) {
+		mdelay(10); /* the hardware was not ready, give it some time */
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	report_info("msch: enabling sch %08x failed after %d retries. pmcw flags: %x",
+		    schid, retry_count, pmcw->flags);
+	return -1;
+}
diff --git a/s390x/css.c b/s390x/css.c
index f0e8f47..6f58d4a 100644
--- a/s390x/css.c
+++ b/s390x/css.c
@@ -40,11 +40,29 @@ static void test_enumerate(void)
  	}
  }
+static void test_enable(void)
+{
+	int cc;
+
+	if (!test_device_sid) {
+		report_skip("No device");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cc = css_enable(test_device_sid);
+
+	if (cc)
+		report(0, "Failed to enable subchannel %08x", test_device_sid);
+	else
+		report(1, "Subchannel %08x enabled", test_device_sid);

Could you please write this as:

	report(cc == 1, "Enable subchannel %08x", test_device_sid);

... checking for a right value is the whole point of the first parameter
of report() :-)

  Thanks,
   Thomas


OK, thanks,
Pierre

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux