Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 09/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:46:05 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2020-05-27 11:42, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 May 2020 18:07:28 +0200
> > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> A second step when testing the channel subsystem is to prepare a channel
> >> for use.
> >> This includes:
> >> - Get the current subchannel Information Block (SCHIB) using STSCH
> >> - Update it in memory to set the ENABLE bit
> >> - Tell the CSS that the SCHIB has been modified using MSCH
> >> - Get the SCHIB from the CSS again to verify that the subchannel is
> >>    enabled.
> >> - If the subchannel is not enabled retry a predefined retries count.
> >>
> >> This tests the MSCH instruction to enable a channel succesfuly.
> >> This is NOT a routine to really enable the channel, no retry is done,
> >> in case of error, a report is made.  
> > 
> > Hm... so you retry if the subchannel is not enabled after cc 0, but you
> > don't retry if the cc indicates busy/status pending? Makes sense, as we
> > don't expect the subchannel to be busy, but a more precise note in the
> > patch description would be good :)  
> 
> OK, I add something like
> "
> - If the command succeed but subchannel is not enabled retry a

s/succeed/succeeds/ :)

>    predefined retries count.
> - If the command fails, report the failure and do not retry, even
>    if cc indicates a busy/status as we do not expect this.

"indicates busy/status pending" ?

> "




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux