On 16/05/2020 00.19, Collin Walling wrote:
> Rename diag318 to diag_318 and byte_134 to fac134 in order to keep
> naming schemes consistent with other diags and the read info struct
> and make grepping easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/s390/char/sclp.h | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h
> index ca8f85b53a90..19da822e494c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ struct diag26c_mac_resp {
> } __aligned(8);
>
> #define CPNC_LINUX 0x4
> -union diag318_info {
> +union diag_318_info {
$ grep -r diag.*info arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h
struct diag204_info_blk_hdr {
struct diag204_x_info_blk_hdr {
struct diag204_cpu_info {
struct diag204_x_cpu_info {
struct diag204_x_cpu_info cpus[];
union diag318_info {
... none of these seem to use an underscore between the "diag" and the
number ... so this seems unnecessary to me ... or what do I miss?
Thomas
