Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/hugetlb: Introduce HAVE_ARCH_CLEAR_HUGEPAGE_FLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 May 2020 08:21:34 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>> static inline void arch_clear_hugepage_flags(struct page *page)
> >>> {
> >>> 	<some implementation>
> >>> }
> >>> #define arch_clear_hugepage_flags arch_clear_hugepage_flags
> >>>
> >>> It's a small difference - mainly to avoid adding two variables to the
> >>> overall namespace where one would do.
> >>
> >> Understood, will change and resend.
> > 
> > That's OK - I've queued up that fix.
> >
> 
> Hello Andrew,
> 
> I might not have searched all the relevant trees or might have just searched
> earlier than required. But I dont see these patches (or your proposed fixes)
> either in mmotm (2020-04-29-23-04) or in next-20200504. Wondering if you are
> waiting on a V2 for this series accommodating the changes you had proposed.

hm.  I think I must have got confused and thought you were referring to
a different patch.  Yes please, let's have v2.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux