[PATCH net-next 09/14] net/smc: move the TEST_LINK response processing into event handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Get rid of the extra function and move the two-liner for the TEST_LINK
response processing into the event handler function.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/smc/smc_llc.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index f9ec270818fa..4945abbad111 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -563,13 +563,6 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_delete_link(struct smc_link *link,
 	smc_lgr_terminate_sched(lgr);
 }
 
-static void smc_llc_rx_test_link(struct smc_link *link,
-				 struct smc_llc_msg_test_link *llc)
-{
-	llc->hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
-	smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
-}
-
 static void smc_llc_rx_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
 				    struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_rkey *llc)
 {
@@ -640,7 +633,8 @@ static void smc_llc_event_handler(struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry)
 
 	switch (llc->raw.hdr.common.type) {
 	case SMC_LLC_TEST_LINK:
-		smc_llc_rx_test_link(link, &llc->test_link);
+		llc->test_link.hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
+		smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
 		break;
 	case SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK:
 		if (list_empty(&lgr->list))
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux