On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:44:16 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2020-04-24 10:27, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > On 2/20/20 1:00 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >> Let's make it possible to add and remove a custom io interrupt handler,
> >> that can be used instead of the normal one.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> lib/s390x/interrupt.h | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/interrupt.h
> >>
> >> +static void (*io_int_func)(void);
> >> +
> >> void handle_io_int(void)
> >> {
> >> + if (*io_int_func)
> >> + return (*io_int_func)();
> >> report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> >> stap(), lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int register_io_int_func(void (*f)(void))
> >> +{
> >> + if (io_int_func)
> >> + return -1;
> >> + io_int_func = f;
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int unregister_io_int_func(void (*f)(void))
> >> +{
> >> + if (io_int_func != f)
> >> + return -1;
> >> + io_int_func = NULL;
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > I'm currently working on something similar for PGMs and I see no
> > additional value in two functions for this. Unregistering can be done by
> > doing register_io_int_func(NULL)
> >
> > This should be enough:
> >
> > int register_io_int_func(void (*f)(void))
> > {
> > io_int_func = f;
> > }
You can even make this void :)
> >
> There are several ways to do this and I really don't mind how it is done.
> Since it has been reviewed by, I would like to have the others reviewers
> opinion.
One version might make it easier to catch programming errors, while the
other one is more compact. I don't really have a preference on this,
either is fine with me.
