On 23.04.20 11:10, Janosch Frank wrote: > Up to now we ignored the psw mask and only used the psw address when > bringing up a new cpu. For DAT we need to also load the mask, so let's > do that. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/s390x/smp.c | 2 ++ > s390x/cstart64.S | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c > index 3f86243..6ef0335 100644 > --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c > +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c > @@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw) > cpu->stack = (uint64_t *)alloc_pages(2); > > /* Start without DAT and any other mask bits. */ > + cpu->lowcore->sw_int_psw.mask = psw.mask; > + cpu->lowcore->sw_int_psw.addr = psw.addr; > cpu->lowcore->sw_int_grs[14] = psw.addr; Do we still have to set sw_int_grs[14] ? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
