On 2020-04-22 09:43, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 4/21/20 6:18 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 21.04.20 18:13, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 2020-02-20 13:00, Pierre Morel wrote:
...snip...
Pierre Morel (10):
s390x: saving regs for interrupts
s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
s390x: cr0: adding AFP-register control bit
s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility
Please can you consider applying these 4 patches only.
I will send some changes I made for the patches on css tests.
The first one requires a little more brain power - can anybody at IBM
help reviewing that?
I'll try to understand it :)
But I think we need a new series anyway.
@Pierre: You told me, that you removed delay() and this series still has
it. With the changes needed to the second patch and the delay change we
need all information to make decisions, so a new version of the series
would make sense.
Yes, this is clear, the next series will have some modifications for the
css part.
Also I will send two series, first the general patches with bug fixes
and comments and in a separate series the css specific patches.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
