[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 27/84] s390/cpuinfo: fix wrong output when CPU0 is offline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 872f27103874a73783aeff2aac2b41a489f67d7c ]

/proc/cpuinfo should not print information about CPU 0 when it is offline.

Fixes: 281eaa8cb67c ("s390/cpuinfo: simplify locking and skip offline cpus early")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
[heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx: shortened commit message]
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/processor.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index 6ebc2117c66c7..91b9b3f73de6e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
@@ -165,8 +165,9 @@ static void show_cpu_mhz(struct seq_file *m, unsigned long n)
 static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	unsigned long n = (unsigned long) v - 1;
+	unsigned long first = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
 
-	if (!n)
+	if (n == first)
 		show_cpu_summary(m, v);
 	if (!machine_has_cpu_mhz)
 		return 0;
@@ -179,6 +180,8 @@ static inline void *c_update(loff_t *pos)
 {
 	if (*pos)
 		*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+	else
+		*pos = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
 	return *pos < nr_cpu_ids ? (void *)*pos + 1 : NULL;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux