Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] hugetlbfs: add arch_hugetlb_valid_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:38:16AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> index 2eb6c234d594..81606223494f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ extern void huge_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  extern void set_huge_swap_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  				 pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned long sz);
>  #define set_huge_swap_pte_at set_huge_swap_pte_at
> +bool __init arch_hugetlb_valid_size(unsigned long size);
> +#define arch_hugetlb_valid_size arch_hugetlb_valid_size

Sorry for chimming in late.

Since we're working on removing arch-dependent codes after all.. I'm
thinking whether we can define arch_hugetlb_valid_size() once in the
common header (e.g. linux/hugetlb.h), then in mm/hugetlb.c:

bool __init __attribute((weak)) arch_hugetlb_valid_size(unsigned long size)
{
	return size == HPAGE_SIZE;
}

We can simply redefine arch_hugetlb_valid_size() in arch specific C
files where we want to override the default.  Would that be slightly
cleaner?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux