On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:12:46 -0400 Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Up to now a secondary cpu could have returned from the function it was > executing and ending up somewhere in cstart64.S. This was mostly > circumvented by an endless loop in the function that it executed. > > Let's add a loop to the end of the cpu setup, so we don't have to rely > on added loops in the tests. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > s390x/cstart64.S | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
