On 18.02.20 10:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
eliver_prog(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
>> @@ -856,6 +871,9 @@ static int __must_check __deliver_prog(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> trace_kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt(vcpu->vcpu_id, KVM_S390_PROGRAM_INT,
>> pgm_info.code, 0);
>>
>> + if (kvm_s390_pv_is_protected(vcpu->kvm))
>
> Can we actually ever have PER set, and what would happen if so?
> Shouldn't we also return -EINVAL?
The ultravisor would add a concurrent PER event if appropriate.
