On 10.02.20 14:17, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:39:57 -0500 > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> For protected VMs, the VCPU resets are done by the Ultravisor, as KVM >> has no access to the VCPU registers. >> >> As the Ultravisor will only accept a call for the reset that is >> needed, we need to fence the UV calls when chaining resets. > > Last time, I suggested replacing this with > > "Note that the ultravisor will only accept a call for the exact reset > that has been requested." > > I still suggest that :) Will do. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> >> [borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx: patch merging, splitting, fixing] >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> >
