Re: [PATCH 07/35] KVM: s390: add new variants of UV CALL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10.02.20 13:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri,  7 Feb 2020 06:39:30 -0500
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This add 2 new variants of the UV CALL.
> 
> "This adds two new helper functions for doing UV CALLs."

ack

> 
> ?
> 
>>
>> The first variant handles UV CALLs that might have longer busy
>> conditions or just need longer when doing partial completion. We should
>> schedule when necessary.
>>
>> The second variant handles UV CALLs that only need the handle but have
>> no payload (e.g. destroying a VM). We can provide a simple wrapper for
>> those.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx: patch merging, splitting, fixing]
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux