On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:41:06PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 04.02.20 10:46, Oscar Salvador wrote: > > I have to confess that it took me while to wrap around my head > > with the new min() change, but looks ok: > > It's a pattern commonly used in compilers and emulators to calculate the > number of bytes to the next block/alignment. (we're missing a macro > (like we have ALIGN_UP/IS_ALIGNED) for that - but it's hard to come up > with a good name (e.g., SIZE_TO_NEXT_ALIGN) . You can just write the easy to understand ... ALIGN_UP(x) - x ... which is better *without* having a separate name. Does that not generate good machine code for you? Segher
