Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/9] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/23/20 2:32 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.01.20 14:42, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Up to now a secondary cpu could have returned from the function it was
>> executing and ending up somewhere in cstart64.S. This was mostly
>> circumvented by an endless loop in the function that it executed.
>>
>> Let's add a loop to the end of the cpu setup, so we don't have to rely
>> on added loops in the tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  s390x/cstart64.S | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
>> index 9af6bb3..5fd8d2f 100644
>> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
>> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
>> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ smp_cpu_setup_state:
>>  	/* We should only go once through cpu setup and not for every restart */
>>  	stg	%r14, GEN_LC_RESTART_NEW_PSW + 8
>>  	br	%r14
>> +	/* If the function returns, just loop here */
>> +0:	j	0
>>  
>>  pgm_int:
>>  	SAVE_REGS
>>
> 
> This patch collides with a patch I have still queued
> 
> Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Dec 11 06:59:22 2019 -0500
> 
>     s390x: smp: Use full PSW to bringup new cpu
>     
>     Up to now we ignored the psw mask and only used the psw address when
>     bringing up a new cpu. For DAT we need to also load the mask, so let's
>     do that.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Message-Id: <20191211115923.9191-2-frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> In that patch we use a lpswe to jump to the target code, not a br. So the
> return address will no longer be stored in %14 and this code here would stop working
> AFAIKS.
> 
> Shall I drop that patch for now?

Please drop "s390x: smp: Use full PSW to bringup new cpu"
I will send out a fixed version of that patch soonish. It will load a
label for lpswe into r14 before doing the lpswe.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux