On 22/01/2020 15:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/01/20 15:15, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 22/01/2020 13.16, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 22/01/2020 11.40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 22.01.20 11:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> On 22/01/2020 11.32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.01.20 11:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>>>> On 22/01/2020 11.22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 22.01.20 11:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>> Doing a fresh ./configure + make on RHEL7 gives me
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [linux1@rhkvm01 kvm-unit-tests]$ make
>>>>>>>>> gcc -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -I /home/linux1/git/kvm-unit-tests/lib -I /home/linux1/git/kvm-unit-tests/lib/s390x -I lib -O2 -march=zEC12 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -g -MMD -MF s390x/.sclp.d -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wempty-body -Wuninitialized -Wignored-qualifiers -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -Wno-frame-address -fno-pic -Wclobbered -Wunused-but-set-parameter -Wmissing-parameter-type -Wold-style-declaration -Woverride-init -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o s390x/sclp.o s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c: In function 'test_one_simple':
>>>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c:121:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>>>>>>>> ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c: At top level:
>>>>>>>>> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-frame-address" [-Werror]
>>>>>>>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>>>>>>> make: *** [s390x/sclp.o] Error 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The following makes it work:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/s390x/sclp.c b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>> index c13fa60..0b8117a 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -117,8 +117,10 @@ static bool test_one_ro(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t
>>>>>>>> static bool test_one_simple(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t sccb_len,
>>>>>>>> uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> + SCCBHeader *header = (void *)sccb_template;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
>>>>>>>> - ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>>>> + header->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While that might silence the compiler warning, we still might get
>>>>>>> aliasing problems here, I think.
>>>>>>> The right way to solve this problem is to turn sccb_template into a
>>>>>>> union of the various structs/arrays that you want to use and then access
>>>>>>> the fields through the union instead ("type-punning through union").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We do have the exact same thing in lib/s390x/sclp.c already, no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should carefully check that code, too...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Especially, new compilers don't seem to care?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've seen horrible bugs due to these aliasing problems in the past -
>>>>> without compiler warnings showing up! Certain versions of GCC assume
>>>>> that they can re-order code with pointers that point to types of
>>>>> different sizes, i.e. in the above example, I think they could assume
>>>>> that they could re-order the memset() and the header->length = ... line.
>>>>> I'd feel better if we play safe and use a union here.
>>>>
>>>> Should we simply allow type-punning?
>>>
>>> Maybe yes. The kernel also compiles with "-fno-strict-aliasing", and
>>> since kvm-unit-tests is mainly a "playground" for people who do kernel
>>> development, too, we should maybe also compile the unit tests with
>>> "-fno-strict-aliasing".
>>>
>>> Paolo, Andrew, Laurent, what do you think?
>
> I think enabling -fno-strict-aliasing is a good idea.
I agree too
Laurent
