On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:46:38 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that we have a loop which is executed after we return from the
> main function of a secondary cpu, we can remove the surplus loops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> s390x/smp.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> index 555ed72..c12a3db 100644
> --- a/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static void wait_for_flag(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static void cpu_loop(void)
> -{
> - for (;;) {}
> -}
> -
> static void test_func(void)
> {
> testflag = 1;
> - cpu_loop();
> }
>
> static void test_start(void)
> @@ -234,7 +228,7 @@ int main(void)
>
> /* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
> psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> - psw.addr = (unsigned long)cpu_loop;
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
Before, you did not set testflag here... intended change?
> smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> smp_cpu_stop(1);
>
