On 1/14/20 6:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:30:51 -0500 > Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Let's stop and start instead of using setup to run a function on a >> cpu. > > Looking at the code, we only support active == operating state and > !active == stopped state anyway, right? Yes, although I think it might make sense to go over the active tracking in the future and rather make it a setup tracking. We can always ask via sigp run if the cpu is running. More stuff to add to the todo... > >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> s390x/smp.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature