Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] btrfs: Use larger zlib buffer for s390 hardware compression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/3/20 5:33 PM, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
In order to benefit from s390 zlib hardware compression support,
increase the btrfs zlib workspace buffer size from 1 to 4 pages (if
s390 zlib hardware support is enabled on the machine). This brings up
to 60% better performance in hardware on s390 compared to the PAGE_SIZE
buffer and much more compared to the software zlib processing in btrfs.
In case of memory pressure fall back to a single page buffer during
workspace allocation.

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/compression.c |   2 +-
  fs/btrfs/zlib.c        | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
index ee834ef7beb4..6bd0e75a822c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ int btrfs_decompress_buf2page(const char *buf, unsigned long buf_start,
  	/* copy bytes from the working buffer into the pages */
  	while (working_bytes > 0) {
  		bytes = min_t(unsigned long, bvec.bv_len,
-				PAGE_SIZE - buf_offset);
+				PAGE_SIZE - (buf_offset % PAGE_SIZE));
  		bytes = min(bytes, working_bytes);
kaddr = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zlib.c b/fs/btrfs/zlib.c
index a6c90a003c12..159486801631 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zlib.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zlib.c
@@ -20,9 +20,12 @@
  #include <linux/refcount.h>
  #include "compression.h"
+#define ZLIB_DFLTCC_BUF_SIZE (4 * PAGE_SIZE)
+
  struct workspace {
  	z_stream strm;
  	char *buf;
+	unsigned long buf_size;
  	struct list_head list;
  	int level;
  };
@@ -61,7 +64,17 @@ struct list_head *zlib_alloc_workspace(unsigned int level)
  			zlib_inflate_workspacesize());
  	workspace->strm.workspace = kvmalloc(workspacesize, GFP_KERNEL);
  	workspace->level = level;
-	workspace->buf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	workspace->buf = NULL;
+	if (zlib_deflate_dfltcc_enabled()) {
+		workspace->buf = kmalloc(ZLIB_DFLTCC_BUF_SIZE,
+					 __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY |
+					 __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOIO);
+		workspace->buf_size = ZLIB_DFLTCC_BUF_SIZE;
+	}
+	if (!workspace->buf) {
+		workspace->buf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+		workspace->buf_size = PAGE_SIZE;
+	}
  	if (!workspace->strm.workspace || !workspace->buf)
  		goto fail;
@@ -78,6 +91,7 @@ int zlib_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
  		unsigned long *total_in, unsigned long *total_out)
  {
  	struct workspace *workspace = list_entry(ws, struct workspace, list);
+	int i;
  	int ret;
  	char *data_in;
  	char *cpage_out;
@@ -85,6 +99,7 @@ int zlib_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
  	struct page *in_page = NULL;
  	struct page *out_page = NULL;
  	unsigned long bytes_left;
+	unsigned long in_buf_pages;
  	unsigned long len = *total_out;
  	unsigned long nr_dest_pages = *out_pages;
  	const unsigned long max_out = nr_dest_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -102,9 +117,6 @@ int zlib_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
  	workspace->strm.total_in = 0;
  	workspace->strm.total_out = 0;
- in_page = find_get_page(mapping, start >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	data_in = kmap(in_page);
-
  	out_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
  	if (out_page == NULL) {
  		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -114,12 +126,48 @@ int zlib_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
  	pages[0] = out_page;
  	nr_pages = 1;
- workspace->strm.next_in = data_in;
+	workspace->strm.next_in = workspace->buf;
+	workspace->strm.avail_in = 0;
  	workspace->strm.next_out = cpage_out;
  	workspace->strm.avail_out = PAGE_SIZE;
-	workspace->strm.avail_in = min(len, PAGE_SIZE);
while (workspace->strm.total_in < len) {
+		/* get next input pages and copy the contents to
+		 * the workspace buffer if required
+		 */
+		if (workspace->strm.avail_in == 0) {
+			bytes_left = len - workspace->strm.total_in;
+			in_buf_pages = min(DIV_ROUND_UP(bytes_left, PAGE_SIZE),
+					   workspace->buf_size / PAGE_SIZE);
+			if (in_buf_pages > 1) {
+				for (i = 0; i < in_buf_pages; i++) {
+					if (in_page) {
+						kunmap(in_page);
+						put_page(in_page);
+					}
+					in_page = find_get_page(mapping,
+								start >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+					data_in = kmap(in_page);
+					memcpy(workspace->buf + i*PAGE_SIZE,
+					       data_in, PAGE_SIZE);
+					start += PAGE_SIZE;
+				}

Is there a reason to leave the last in_page mapped here? I realize we'll clean it up further down, but since we're copying everything into the buf anyway why not just map->copy->unmap for everything?

+				workspace->strm.next_in = workspace->buf;
+			} else {
+				if (in_page) {
+					kunmap(in_page);
+					put_page(in_page);
+				}
+				in_page = find_get_page(mapping,
+							start >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+				data_in = kmap(in_page);
+				start += PAGE_SIZE;
+				workspace->strm.next_in = data_in;
+			}
+			workspace->strm.avail_in = min(bytes_left,
+						       workspace->buf_size);
+		}
+
  		ret = zlib_deflate(&workspace->strm, Z_SYNC_FLUSH);
  		if (ret != Z_OK) {
  			pr_debug("BTRFS: deflate in loop returned %d\n",
@@ -136,6 +184,7 @@ int zlib_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
  			ret = -E2BIG;
  			goto out;
  		}
+

Extra newline.  Thanks,

Josef



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux