Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 8/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:24:18 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2019-12-13 10:43, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:20:07 +0100
> > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 2019-12-12 15:10, Pierre Morel wrote:  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2019-12-12 13:26, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
> >>>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:46:09 +0100
> >>>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >   
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +    senseid.cu_type = buffer[2] | (buffer[1] << 8);  
> >>>>
> >>>> This still looks odd; why not have the ccw fill out the senseid
> >>>> structure directly?  
> >>>
> >>> Oh sorry, you already said and I forgot to modify this.
> >>> thanks  
> >>
> >> hum, sorry, I forgot, the sense structure is not padded so I need this.  
> > 
> > Very confused; I see padding in the senseid structure? (And what does
> > padding have to do with it?)  
> 
> Sorry my fault:
> I wanted to say packed and... I forgot to pack the senseid structure.
> So I change this.

Ah, good :)

> 
> > 
> > Also, you only copy the cu type... it would really be much better if
> > you looked at the whole structure you got back from the hypervisor;
> > that would also allow you to do some more sanity checks etc. If you
> > really can't pass in a senseid structure directly, just copy everything
> > you got?
> >   
> 
> No I can, just need to work properly ;)
> 
> I will only check on the cu_type but report_info() on all fields.

Sounds good!





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux