Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: smp: Setup CRs from cpu 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11.12.19 12:59, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Grab the CRs (currently only 0, 1, 7, 13) from cpu 0, so we can
> bringup the new cpu in DAT mode or set other control options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/smp.c  | 5 ++++-
>  s390x/cstart64.S | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> index e17751a..4dfe7c6 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,10 @@ int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
>  	cpu->lowcore->sw_int_grs[15] = (uint64_t)cpu->stack + (PAGE_SIZE * 4);
>  	lc->restart_new_psw.mask = 0x0000000180000000UL;
>  	lc->restart_new_psw.addr = (uint64_t)smp_cpu_setup_state;
> -	lc->sw_int_crs[0] = 0x0000000000040000UL;
> +	lc->sw_int_crs[0] = stctg(0);
> +	lc->sw_int_crs[1] = stctg(1);
> +	lc->sw_int_crs[7] = stctg(7);
> +	lc->sw_int_crs[13] = stctg(13);

Wouldn't it be better to also be able to specify the CRs explicitly here?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux