On 10/12/2019 11.07, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-12-09 12:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 06/12/2019 17.26, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> These are the include and library utilities for the css tests patch
>>> series.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> lib/s390x/css.h | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> lib/s390x/css_dump.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 415 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/css.h
>>> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/css_dump.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/css.h b/lib/s390x/css.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..6f19bb5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/css.h
>> [...]
>>> +/* Debug functions */
>>> +char *dump_pmcw_flags(uint16_t f);
>>> +char *dump_scsw_flags(uint32_t f);
>>> +#undef DEBUG
>>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>>> +void dump_scsw(struct scsw *);
>>> +void dump_irb(struct irb *irbp);
>>> +void dump_schib(struct schib *sch);
>>> +struct ccw *dump_ccw(struct ccw *cp);
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void dump_scsw(struct scsw *scsw) {}
>>> +static inline void dump_irb(struct irb *irbp) {}
>>> +static inline void dump_pmcw(struct pmcw *p) {}
>>> +static inline void dump_schib(struct schib *sch) {}
>>> +static inline void dump_orb(struct orb *op) {}
>>> +static inline struct ccw *dump_ccw(struct ccw *cp)
>>> +{
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I'd prefer to not have a "#undef DEBUG" (or "#define DEBUG") statement
>
> Anyway hawfull!
>
>> in the header here - it could trigger unexpected behavior with other
>> files that also use a DEBUG macro.
>>
>> Could you please declare the prototypes here and move the "#else" part
>> to the .c file instead? Thanks!
>
> What if I use a CSS_DEBUG here instead of a simple DEBUG definition?
>
> It can be enabled or not by defining CSS_ENABLED ahead of the include...?
Why does it have to be in the header and not in the .c file?
Thomas
