Re: [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/19/19 7:48 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:56:12 +0100
> Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Register the chp_event callback to receive channel path related
>> events for the subchannels managed by vfio-ccw.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>>     v0->v1: [EF]
>>      - Add s390dbf trace
>>
>>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
>> index 91989269faf1..05da1facee60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include <asm/isc.h>
>>  
>> +#include "chp.h"
>>  #include "ioasm.h"
>>  #include "css.h"
>>  #include "vfio_ccw_private.h"
>> @@ -257,6 +258,48 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_event(struct subchannel *sch, int process)
>>  	return rc;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int vfio_ccw_chp_event(struct subchannel *sch,
>> +			      struct chp_link *link, int event)
>> +{
>> +	struct vfio_ccw_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(&sch->dev);
>> +	int mask = chp_ssd_get_mask(&sch->ssd_info, link);
>> +	int retry = 255;
>> +
>> +	if (!private || !mask)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (cio_update_schib(sch))
>> +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> It seems this return code is only checked by the common I/O layer for
> the _OFFLINE case; still, it's probably not a bad idea, even though it
> is different from what the vanilla I/O subchannel driver does.

cio_update_schib() itself can only return -ENODEV so it seemed sane.

> 
>> +
>> +	VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2, "%pUl (%x.%x.%04x): mask=0x%x event=%d\n",
>> +			   mdev_uuid(private->mdev), sch->schid.cssid,
>> +			   sch->schid.ssid, sch->schid.sch_no,
>> +			   mask, event);
> 
> If you log only here, you're missing the case above.

Ah, yes.  I'll move that up.

> 
>> +
>> +	switch (event) {
>> +	case CHP_VARY_OFF:
>> +		/* Path logically turned off */
>> +		sch->opm &= ~mask;
>> +		sch->lpm &= ~mask;
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHP_OFFLINE:
>> +		/* Path is gone */
>> +		cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &retry);
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHP_VARY_ON:
>> +		/* Path logically turned on */
>> +		sch->opm |= mask;
>> +		sch->lpm |= mask;
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHP_ONLINE:
>> +		/* Path became available */
>> +		sch->lpm |= mask & sch->opm;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
> 
> Looks sane as the first round.
> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static struct css_device_id vfio_ccw_sch_ids[] = {
>>  	{ .match_flags = 0x1, .type = SUBCHANNEL_TYPE_IO, },
>>  	{ /* end of list */ },
>> @@ -274,6 +317,7 @@ static struct css_driver vfio_ccw_sch_driver = {
>>  	.remove = vfio_ccw_sch_remove,
>>  	.shutdown = vfio_ccw_sch_shutdown,
>>  	.sch_event = vfio_ccw_sch_event,
>> +	.chp_event = vfio_ccw_chp_event,
>>  };
>>  
>>  static int __init vfio_ccw_debug_init(void)
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux