On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hi Miroslav,
>
> > +bool unwind_next_frame_reliable(struct unwind_state *state)
> > +{
> ...
> > +}
> > +
> > void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
> > struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp,
> > bool unwind_reliable)
>
> Did you send the wrong version of your patch series? This patch does
> not integrate your new function into the existing one. Also the new
> parameter you added with the second patch isn't used at all.
No, the version should be correct. Only __unwind_start_reliable() was
integrated. The new parameter is used in arch_stack_walk_reliable()
(unwind_reliable is set to true) and it is propagated to get_stack_info()
where it is used to simplify things for the case.
Miroslav
