Re: [RFC 02/37] s390/protvirt: introduce host side setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.10.19 15:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.10.19 13:40, Janosch Frank wrote:
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Introduce KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST kbuild option for
protected virtual machines hosting support code.

Add "prot_virt" command line option which controls if the kernel
protected VMs support is enabled at runtime.

Extend ultravisor info definitions and expose it via uv_info struct
filled in during startup.

Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
   arch/s390/boot/Makefile                       |  2 +-
   arch/s390/boot/uv.c                           | 20 +++++++-
   arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h                    | 46 ++++++++++++++++--
   arch/s390/kernel/Makefile                     |  1 +
   arch/s390/kernel/setup.c                      |  4 --
   arch/s390/kernel/uv.c                         | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
   arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig                         |  9 ++++
   8 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index c7ac2f3ac99f..aa22e36b3105 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3693,6 +3693,11 @@
   			before loading.
   			See Documentation/admin-guide/blockdev/ramdisk.rst.
+ prot_virt= [S390] enable hosting protected virtual machines
+			isolated from the hypervisor (if hardware supports
+			that).
+			Format: <bool>

Isn't that a virt driver detail that should come in via KVM module
parameters? I don't see quite yet why this has to be a kernel parameter
(that can be changed at runtime).


I was confused by "runtime" in "which controls if the kernel protected VMs support is enabled at runtime"

So this can't be changed at runtime. Can you clarify why kvm can't initialize that when loaded and why we need a kernel parameter?

--

Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux