On 22.10.19 14:16, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/10/2019 12.53, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Expose ram_size and max_ram_size through accessor functions.
We only use get_ram_size in an upcoming patch, but having an accessor
for the other one does not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/s390x/sclp.h | 2 ++
lib/s390x/sclp.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index f00c3df..6d40fb7 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -272,5 +272,7 @@ void sclp_console_setup(void);
void sclp_print(const char *str);
int sclp_service_call(unsigned int command, void *sccb);
void sclp_memory_setup(void);
+uint64_t get_ram_size(void);
+uint64_t get_max_ram_size(void);
#endif /* SCLP_H */
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index 56fca0c..a57096c 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -167,3 +167,12 @@ void sclp_memory_setup(void)
mem_init(ram_size);
}
+
+uint64_t get_ram_size(void)
+{
+ return ram_size;
+}
+uint64_t get_max_ram_size(void)
+{
+ return max_ram_size;
+}
In case you respin, please add an empty line between the two functions.
Indeed
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
