Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/smc: improve termination handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/smc: improve termination handling
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:51:06 -0700
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx, raspl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191009080747.95516-1-kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Organization: Netronome Systems, Ltd.
References: <20191009080747.95516-1-kgraul@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed,  9 Oct 2019 10:07:42 +0200, Karsten Graul wrote:
> First set of patches to improve termination handling.

Applied, thanks.

Out of curiosity why does net/sock.h have to include net/smc.h?
This SMC-specific series causes half of the kernel to rebuild 🤨

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/smc: improve termination handling
  - From: Karsten Graul

Prev by Date: Re: "reuse mergeable anon_vma as parent when fork" causes a crash on s390
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] lib/string: make memzero_explicit inline instead of external
Previous by thread: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net/smc: no new connections on disappearing devices
Next by thread: [PATCH] proc: centralise declaration of cpuinfo_op
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux