On 10/1/19 8:26 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Ok, then why make this a module option that you will have to support
for the next 20+ years anyway if you feel this fix is the correct way
that it should be done instead?
I agree.
Why not just shut FCP down unconditionally on excessive bit errors?
What's the benefit of allowing things to continue? Are you hoping things
will eventually recover in a single-path scenario?
Experience told me that there will be an unforeseen end user scenario where I
need a quick switch to let even shaky paths survive.
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on IBM Z Development
https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
