On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:46:05AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:08:01PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > I am wondering how is it possible that none of the build-testing > > infrastructure we have running against linux-next caught this? Not enough > > non-x86 coverage? > > Well, there is plenty of s390 coverage with respect to daily builds > (also here). It doesn't fail for me with gcc 9.1; so you may either > have a different gcc version or different config options(?) so the > compiler decided to not inline the function. I'll apply this in any > case, since your patch is obviously fine. > > Thanks! Ok, Christian applied this already a couple of minutes earlier ;)
