sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from
generic code.
There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so
just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have
different names for similar technology.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 9de232229063..f29caad71e13 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -461,8 +461,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer");
if (mem_encrypt_active())
- pr_warn_once("%s is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n",
- sme_active() ? "SME" : "SEV");
+ pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n");
mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(hwdev);
