Hi Herbert, On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 20:28:56 +0300 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:28, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:44:54PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:32:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:15:20PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > > > > > > > However that doesn't fix the simd.h header file breakage with the > > > > > second patch :) > > > > > > > > That fix should be there now too. > > > > > > Yes, works now. Thank you! > > > > Still not... with linux-next as of today I get this (s390 defconfig): > > > > ERROR: "crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined! > > scripts/Makefile.modpost:105: recipe for target 'modules-modpost' failed > > > > Hello Heiko, > > Apologies for the breakage. The first two fixes addressed obvious > shortcomings in my code, but with this issue, I'm a bit puzzled tbh. > The calls to these missing functions should be optimized away, since > have_simd never gets assigned if CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD is not > defined, but for some reason, this isn't working. Which version of GCC > are you using? > > Also, could you please try whether the patch below fixes the problem? Thanks > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20190729074434.21064-1-ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx/ It might be time to revert all this series and try again. The implementation seems to have not been well thought through from a kernel building point of view. For a start the two commits 7cdc0ddbf74a ("crypto: aegis128 - add support for SIMD acceleration") ecc8bc81f2fb ("crypto: aegis128 - provide a SIMD implementation based on NEON intrinsics") seem to be in the wrong order (function used in the first before being defined in the second). There are a series of declarations of external functions in crypto/aegis128-core.c that should be in a header file. And there was the assumption that asm/simd.h was available everywhere. Also crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd() is referenced in a structure initialisation (unprotected by any CONFIG_ variable - and so will be referenced even if it does not exist). The compiler will have a hard time knowing that "have_simd" is effectively a constant zero (and crypto_simd_usable() is not constant). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp8UzTFDoxHb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
