Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dma: provide proper ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:01:30 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> > > index 6f26f35d4a71..3b0329665b13 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > >   * by the 31 bit heritage.
> > >   */
> > >  #define MAX_DMA_ADDRESS         0x80000000
> > > +#define ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS      31  
> > 
> > powerpc has this in arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h. This really
> > should be consistently defined in the same header file across
> > architectures.
> > 
> > Christoph, what is the preferred header file for this definition?

ping

Christoph could you please answer Heiko's question, so I can do my
respin.

Regards,
Halil

> > 
> > I'd also rather say it would be better to move the #ifndef ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS
> > check to a common code header file instead of having it in a C file, and
> > make it more obvious in which header file architectures should/can override
> > the default, no?  
> 
> +1
> 
> I will wait for Christoph's answer with a respin. Thanks for having a
> look.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux