Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dma: provide proper ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:21:20 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On s390 ZONE_DMA is up to 2G, i.e. ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS should be 31 bits.
> The current value is 24 and makes __dma_direct_alloc_pages() take a
> wrong turn first (but __dma_direct_alloc_pages() recovers then).
> 
> Let's correct ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS value and avoid wrong turns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@xxxxxxx>
> Fixes: c61e9637340e ("dma-direct: add support for allocation from
> ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32")
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> index 6f26f35d4a71..3b0329665b13 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   * by the 31 bit heritage.
>   */
>  #define MAX_DMA_ADDRESS         0x80000000
> +#define ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS      31
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>  extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;

Looks good to me.

Petr T

Attachment: pgpceK25oRmbw.pgp
Description: Digitální podpis OpenPGP


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux