Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/protvirt: restore force_dma_unencrypted()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/15/19 8:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This looks good to me - if you and Tom are fine with it I'd like to
> fold it into his commit so that what I'll send to Linus is bisection
> clean.

I'm ok with folding it in. Sorry about missing that.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
>> Note: we still need sev_active() defined because of the reference
>> in fs/core/vmcore, but this one is likely to go away soon along
>> with the need for an s390 sev_active().
> 
> Any chance we could not change the return value from the function
> at least in this patch/fold as that change seems unrelated to the
> dma functionality.  If that is what you really wanted and only
> the dma code was in the way we can happily merge it as a separate
> patch, of couse.
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux