On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:00:29PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > The basic property being guaranteed by LOOKUP_IN_ROOT is that it will > not result in resolution of a path component which was not inside the > root of the dirfd tree at some point during resolution (and that all > absolute symlink and ".." resolution will be done relative to the > dirfd). This may smell slightly of chroot(2), because unfortunately it > is a similar concept -- the reason for this is to allow for a more > efficient way to safely resolve paths inside a rootfs than spawning a > separate process to then pass back the fd to the caller. IDGI... If attacker can modify your subtree, you have already lost - after all, they can make anything appear inside that tree just before your syscall is made and bring it back out immediately afterwards. And if they can't, what is the race you are trying to protect against? Confused...
