Re: [RFC v1 1/4] vfio-ccw: Set orb.cmd.c64 before calling ccwchain_handle_ccw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon,  1 Jul 2019 12:23:43 -0400
Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Because ccwchain_handle_ccw calls ccwchain_calc_length and
> as per the comment we should set orb.cmd.c64 before calling
> ccwchanin_calc_length.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index d6a8dff..5ac4c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> @@ -640,16 +640,16 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
>  	memcpy(&cp->orb, orb, sizeof(*orb));
>  	cp->mdev = mdev;
>  
> -	/* Build a ccwchain for the first CCW segment */
> -	ret = ccwchain_handle_ccw(orb->cmd.cpa, cp);
> -	if (ret)
> -		cp_free(cp);
> -
>  	/* It is safe to force: if not set but idals used
>  	 * ccwchain_calc_length returns an error.
>  	 */
>  	cp->orb.cmd.c64 = 1;
>  
> +	/* Build a ccwchain for the first CCW segment */
> +	ret = ccwchain_handle_ccw(orb->cmd.cpa, cp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		cp_free(cp);
> +
>  	if (!ret)
>  		cp->initialized = true;
>  

Hm... has this ever been correct, or did this break only with the
recent refactorings?

(IOW, what should Fixes: point to?)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux